FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
Under a netting agreement enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction, Bank A has three terminated trades with a defaulting counterparty. The close-out values to Bank A are +USD 12 million, +USD 7 million and -USD 15 million. No collateral is held. What is Bank A's net claim on the defaulted counterparty?
The net claim is USD 4 million. With enforceable close-out netting, the three values are summed: 12 plus 7 minus 15 equals 4. Using only the positive trades would give USD 19 million, which wrongly ignores the amount Bank A owes on the negative trade.
- AUSD 19 million
- BUSD 4 millionCorrect
- CUSD 34 million
- DUSD 7 million
Explanation
Net = 12 + 7 - 15 = 4 million. Bank A has a USD 4 million claim. USD 19 million ignores the negative trade (no netting). USD 34 million adds absolute values (wrong sign on the negative trade).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- A risk manager is assessing the residual risk on a collateralised portfolio. The counterparty fails to post collateral on day 0 after a marg…
- Which statement best describes the effect of an unenforceable close-out netting agreement in a jurisdiction on a bank's counterparty risk me…
- A bank has two netting sets with one counterparty, each under a separate enforceable agreement. Set 1 has net value +30 million and set 2 ha…
- A bank has a netting set with a counterparty in a jurisdiction where netting enforceability is uncertain. Trades: +20 million and -14 millio…
- A bank trades derivatives with a corporate under a single master agreement that contains a legally enforceable close-out netting provision. …
- A bank has two trades with a counterparty that has just entered insolvency. Trade A has a mark-to-market value of +40 to the bank and Trade …