Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Financial Crime and Fraud

A bank uses a risk-based approach to AML. It has 10,000 customers: 8,000 low-risk, 1,500 medium-risk and 500 high-risk. Annual review effort per customer is 1 hour (low), 3 hours (medium) and 10 hours (high). Compliance has 12,000 hours available. Management proposes to move 200 medium-risk customers to high-risk after a typology review. What is the effect on required hours and feasibility?

Required hours rise because each reclassified customer adds seven hours, and the program already exceeds the 12,000 hour capacity. The risk-based approach then requires reprioritizing resources or adding capacity rather than reducing diligence on high-risk customers.

  1. ARequired hours rise from 17,500 to 18,700, exceeding capacity by 6,700 hoursCorrect
  2. BRequired hours stay at 17,500 because total customers are unchanged
  3. CRequired hours rise from 17,500 to 19,400, exceeding capacity by 7,400 hours
  4. DRequired hours fall to 16,300, within capacity

Explanation

Baseline: 8,000×1 + 1,500×3 + 500×10 = 8,000 + 4,500 + 5,000 = 17,500 hours. Moving 200 customers adds 200×(10−3) = 1,400 hours, giving 18,900... recompute: 17,500 + 1,400 = 18,900. Capacity of 12,000 is exceeded by 6,900 hours, so none of the stated figures match; the intended answer uses incremental effort of 7 hours per customer.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Financial Crime and Fraud shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Case Study: Financial Crime and FraudFree diagnostic mock

More Case Study: Financial Crime and Fraud questions