Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Cyber-resilience: Range of Practices

A bank's business continuity plan was last tested by a tabletop walkthrough that assumed the failure of a single data center. The risk committee asks how to improve the credibility of its cyber recovery capability. Which action is most appropriate?

Run broader scenario-based exercises that include data corruption, third-party failure and degraded communications, involving business lines as well as technology, then update the plan with the lessons. Repeating a narrow tabletop or only reviewing documents does not demonstrate real recovery capability.

  1. ARun scenario-based exercises that include data corruption, loss of a third-party provider and degraded communications, and feed lessons learned into the planCorrect
  2. BRepeat the same tabletop annually to ensure staff remain familiar with it
  3. CReplace testing with a documented review of the plan by internal audit
  4. DLimit testing to technology teams so business lines are not disrupted

Explanation

Cyber-resilience practice stresses testing severe but plausible scenarios, involving business, technology and third parties, and updating plans from the lessons learned. Repeating the same narrow tabletop or relying on document review does not validate recovery. Excluding business lines leaves dependencies untested.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Cyber-resilience: Range of Practices shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Cyber-resilience: Range of Practices questions