FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value
A bank's daily losses are modeled using a peaks-over-threshold approach. The threshold u is 2.0 (in millions), 5% of observations exceed it, the fitted generalized Pareto parameters are xi = 0.25 and beta = 0.5. Using VaR = u + (beta/xi)[((n/Nu)(1-p))^(-xi) - 1], with Nu/n = 0.05, what is the 99.9% VaR, to two decimals?
The computed value is about 5.32, so none of the listed options is right.
- A3.21
- B3.71Correct
- C2.99
- D4.15
Explanation
(n/Nu)(1-p)=20*0.001=0.02. 0.02^(-0.25)=1/0.02^0.25; 0.02^0.5=0.14142, ^0.5=0.37606, so inverse=2.659. Minus 1 =1.659. Times beta/xi=2 gives 3.318. Adding u=2.0 gives 5.32... recompute: check options. Correct VaR = 2+3.318=5.32, which is not listed.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value questions
- A risk manager fits a generalized Pareto distribution to losses above a threshold and is deciding how to set the threshold. Which statement …
- An analyst estimates the GEV distribution for maximum weekly losses of a portfolio and obtains a tail index parameter ξ of 0.30. Which inter…
- An analyst uses the Hill estimator on the largest exceedances of a loss series and obtains a tail index estimate of 4. The analyst wants the…
- Daily losses show volatility clustering, so extreme losses tend to occur in bunches. A risk manager wants to apply peaks-over-threshold EVT …
- A risk analyst models losses that exceed a high threshold u for a trading portfolio. Which statement best describes the result that justifie…
- A risk manager notes that estimated GEV parameters for monthly maximum losses change materially when the block length is changed from one mo…