FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value
An analyst uses the Hill estimator on the largest exceedances of a loss series and obtains a tail index estimate of 4. The analyst wants the corresponding shape parameter ξ for a GPD tail. What is ξ, and what does it say about the tail?
The tail index is the reciprocal of the shape parameter, so ξ equals 1/4, or 0.25. This is a positive value, indicating a heavy power-law tail. Moments exist only below order 4, so the variance is finite, but the tail is much fatter than that of a normal distribution.
- Aξ = 4, indicating an extremely heavy tail
- Bξ = 0.25, indicating a heavy tail with finite varianceCorrect
- Cξ = 0.25, indicating a thin tail like the normal
- Dξ = −0.25, indicating a bounded tail
Explanation
The tail index α is the reciprocal of ξ, so ξ = 1/4 = 0.25. A positive ξ means a heavy, power-law tail. Since moments exist only up to order α = 4, the variance (order 2) is finite. The normal has ξ = 0, not 0.25, and a bounded tail needs ξ < 0.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value questions
- A risk manager models the maximum loss over blocks of n = 10 days with a Gumbel GEV (ξ = 0) with location m = 2.0% and scale β = 0.5%. The G…
- A risk team notes that its 99.9% VaR from a normal model is far below that from an EVT model fitted to the same loss history, which has a po…
- An analyst applies the Hill estimator to estimate the tail parameter from the k = 3 largest losses of a sample: 8, 6 and 5 (in $ millions). …
- A risk manager has estimated a 99.9% one-day VaR from a GPD fitted to exceedances. Which practical concern is MOST relevant to the reliabili…
- An analyst studies the largest daily loss in each of many 20-day blocks for a trading portfolio. According to the Fisher-Tippett-Gnedenko th…
- A bank's daily losses are modeled using a peaks-over-threshold approach. The threshold u is 2.0 (in millions), 5% of observations exceed it,…