Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Cyberthreats and Information Security Risks

A bank's risk team wants to express cyber risk in financial terms for the board. Which approach best reflects a quantitative cyber risk measure rather than a qualitative one?

Estimating annual loss exposure as frequency times severity is a quantitative cyber risk measure because it produces a monetary expected loss. Heat-map ratings, blocked-email counts and control checklists describe status or activity but do not convert cyber risk into financial terms for decision making.

  1. ARating each system red, amber or green based on workshop opinions
  2. BEstimating annual loss exposure as expected event frequency multiplied by expected loss severityCorrect
  3. CCounting the number of phishing emails blocked each month
  4. DListing the controls from a security framework that are fully implemented

Explanation

Multiplying estimated annual frequency by expected severity yields a monetary expected loss, which is a quantitative measure. Red/amber/green ratings are qualitative. Phishing counts and control lists are activity or compliance indicators, not financial loss measures.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Cyberthreats and Information Security Risks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Cyberthreats and Information Security Risks questions