Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice

A bank's stress test shows a minimum post-stress Tier 1 common ratio of 7.0% against an internal target of 6.0%. Supervisors note the bank assumed it would keep paying planned dividends and could freely issue new equity in the stress period, while its pre-provision net revenue was projected using baseline growth. Which statement best assesses the 1.0% cushion?

The 1.0% cushion is likely overstated. Assuming easy equity issuance and baseline revenue growth under stress is unrealistic, since markets may be closed and income falls. Credible capital plans use conservative, scenario-consistent assumptions about management actions and earnings.

  1. AIt is likely overstated because management actions and revenue assumptions are not credible under stressCorrect
  2. BIt is understated because dividends reduce capital needs
  3. CIt is accurate because the target is exceeded
  4. DIt is irrelevant because only Tier 2 matters

Explanation

Assuming equity issuance may be unavailable in stress and baseline revenue growth is inconsistent with the scenario. Both inflate the post-stress ratio. Dividends being paid actually lower capital, but the key flaw is unrealistic favorable assumptions, so the cushion is overstated.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Capital Planning at Large Bank Holding Companies: Supervisory Expectations and Range of Current Practice questions