FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly)
A betting-against-beta (BAB) portfolio goes long low-beta stocks and short high-beta stocks. The long leg has beta 0.60 and the short leg has beta 1.50. To make the portfolio market-neutral, how much should be held long per 1 unit of capital short, in terms of the long-leg notional?
The long leg should be 2.50 per 1 unit short. Market neutrality requires long notional times 0.60 to equal short notional times 1.50, so the long position is 1.50 divided by 0.60, which equals 2.50, meaning the long leg is levered.
- A0.40
- B2.50Correct
- C0.90
- D1.50
Explanation
Beta-neutral requires L x 0.60 = S x 1.50 with S=1. L = 1.50/0.60 = 2.50. Option 0.40 inverts the ratio; 1.50 ignores the long beta.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly) questions
- A fund holds a low-beta portfolio with beta 0.6 and realized excess return of 7.0%. The market excess return was 8.0%. What is its CAPM alph…
- Behavioral explanations of the low-risk anomaly often cite a preference for lottery-like payoffs. Which statement correctly applies this ide…
- A study of equity returns shows that low-beta stocks have historically delivered higher risk-adjusted returns than high-beta stocks, contrar…
- An analyst finds that a strategy earns a positive CAPM alpha, but the alpha disappears when value and momentum factors are added to the regr…
- Many investors cannot use leverage or short selling. According to the leverage-aversion explanation, what does this constraint imply for the…
- An analyst argues that the low-risk anomaly persists because many professional managers are evaluated against a benchmark using tracking err…