CSEET · Business Laws and Management · Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments
A bill of exchange is drawn and indorsed in India but accepted payable in France and is dishonoured. What law determines what constitutes dishonour and what notice of dishonour is sufficient?
The law of France applies, because Section 135 provides that when an instrument is payable at a place different from where it was made or indorsed, the law of the place of payment decides what amounts to dishonour and what notice is sufficient.
- AThe law of India, where it was drawn
- BThe law of the place where the indorsee lives
- CThe law of France, where it is made payableCorrect
- DThe law chosen by the drawer after dishonour
Explanation
Section 135 states that where an instrument is payable in a different place from where it is made or indorsed, the law of the place of payment determines dishonour and the sufficiency of notice. The payment place here is France, so French law applies. Indian rules on notice are not required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments questions
- As regards its territorial extent, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 extends to:
- Anil signs a cheque payable to "Bharat Traders" without adding words that prohibit transfer or show that it is not transferable. How is the …
- Consider the statements about instruments made payable to order or to bearer. Statement I: An instrument expressed to be payable to a partic…
- A hundi written in an oriental language is governed by a local usage. The body of the instrument contains words showing that the legal relat…
- Meera drew a cheque on a bank in Pune for a debt due to Kavita. Meera had enough funds, but Kavita did not present the cheque within a reaso…
- A promissory note was obtained from its maker, Karan, by means of fraud. Mehta now holds it and sues Karan. Under the presumptions in the Ac…