CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Debt Recovery and SARFAESI
A borrower files a section 17 application before the DRT on 1 June challenging possession taken by the bank. The DRT has not disposed of it by 1 October, which is beyond four months, and no valid extension order exists. What may a party do under the SARFAESI Act?
A party may apply to the Appellate Tribunal, which may order the DRT to dispose of the pending application expeditiously. Section 17 requires disposal within sixty days, extendable to a maximum of four months, and gives this remedy if that outer limit is crossed.
- ATreat the bank's measure as automatically declared invalid
- BApply to the Appellate Tribunal for directing the DRT to dispose of the application expeditiouslyCorrect
- CWithdraw and refile before the same DRT to restart the sixty-day period
- DApply to the Recovery Officer for ordering the DRT to decide
Explanation
Section 17(5) requires disposal within sixty days, extendable for recorded reasons, but the total pendency cannot exceed four months. Under section 17(6), if not disposed of within four months, any party may apply to the Appellate Tribunal for directing expeditious disposal. The Act does not provide for automatic invalidation of the bank's measure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Debt Recovery and SARFAESI shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Debt Recovery and SARFAESI questions
- Under SARFAESI, a DRT passes an order under section 17 against borrower Kaveri Textiles Pvt Ltd. The debt claimed by the secured creditor is…
- A notification under section 20A declares the date of integration of registration systems with the Central Registry. Which consequence follo…
- An aggrieved person wants to appeal against an order made by a Debts Recovery Tribunal in an application filed by a bank for recovery of deb…
- Venkat Constructions Ltd is a debtor under a recovery certificate. The Recovery Officer passed an order under section 30 of the RDB Act, and…
- Under the proviso to Section 27 of the SARFAESI Act, as inserted by Act 44 of 2016 with effect from 24-1-2020, what is the position of the f…
- Rao Steels Ltd owes a bank a debt determined by the Tribunal at Rs 8 crore. Rao Steels wants to appeal to the Tribunal against an order of t…