CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Debt Recovery and SARFAESI
An aggrieved person wants to appeal against an order made by a Debts Recovery Tribunal in an application filed by a bank for recovery of debts. Separately, a creditor is unhappy with an order of the Adjudicating Authority in a proceeding under Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Under Section 17 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, which statement is correct?
The Appellate Tribunal entertains appeals against orders of a Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act. From the date appointed by the Central Government, it also hears appeals against Adjudicating Authority orders under Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as Section 17(2) and (2A) provide.
- AThe Appellate Tribunal under that Act hears appeals against Tribunal orders under the Act, and from the date appointed by the Central Government, also against Adjudicating Authority orders under Part III of the CodeCorrect
- BThe Tribunal itself hears appeals against its own orders under sub-section (2)
- CThe Appellate Tribunal hears appeals only against Part III orders, not against orders of the Tribunal
- DTribunals hear Part III Code applications only through circuit sittings, and no appeal lies to the Appellate Tribunal
Explanation
Section 17(2) gives the Appellate Tribunal jurisdiction over appeals against orders made, or deemed made, by a Tribunal under the Act. Section 17(2A) extends this, from a date to be appointed, to appeals against Adjudicating Authority orders under Part III of the Code. The other options misstate who hears appeals.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Debt Recovery and SARFAESI shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Debt Recovery and SARFAESI questions
- A borrower files a section 17 application before the DRT on 1 June challenging possession taken by the bank. The DRT has not disposed of it …
- Meridian Steels Ltd owes secured debts to two banks, Bank A and Bank B, which have filed recovery applications before the DRT at Pune and th…
- Ravi Agro Ltd received a Section 13(2) notice, and the sixty days have lapsed. The bank published an auction notice for the secured factory …
- A notification setting up the Central Registry under section 20(1) of the SARFAESI Act has been issued. Rao Finance Ltd, a secured creditor,…
- Venkat Constructions Ltd is a debtor under a recovery certificate. The Recovery Officer passed an order under section 30 of the RDB Act, and…
- The Appellate Tribunal has passed a transfer order under section 5A in favour of the DRT at Kolkata. The DRT at Chennai, where Bank B's appl…