CA Foundation · Business Laws · The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
A cheque is crossed generally. The drawee banker pays it to a person who is not the true owner, but does so in good faith and without negligence, and the crossing is regular on its face. What is the banker's position under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
The banker is protected and is treated as if it had paid the true owner. When a crossed cheque is paid in due course, in good faith, without negligence and in accordance with the crossing, the banker and the drawer are placed in the same position as if payment reached the rightful owner.
- AThe banker is liable to the true owner for the full amount
- BThe banker is entitled to the same protection as if the cheque were paid to the true ownerCorrect
- CThe banker is liable only if the drawer requests a refund
- DThe banker may recover the amount from the drawer as a loan
Explanation
If a banker pays a crossed cheque in due course, in good faith and without negligence, in accordance with the crossing, the banker and the drawer are placed in the same position as if the cheque had been paid to the true owner. So the banker is protected and the drawer is treated as discharged. Liability to the true owner does not fall on the banker.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 questions
- Gopal, a Kochi merchant, draws a bill on Haridas payable to Iqbal. Haridas is not a party to it by acceptance yet. Iqbal needs money, so he …
- Pooja holds a bill of Rs 90,000 payable to her order. She endorses it 'Pay to Qadir or order, Rs 40,000 only' and delivers it. What is the e…
- Vikram Joshi, aged 16, signs a promissory note for Rs 20,000 in favour of Harish Traders in exchange for a motorcycle. Harish Traders endors…
- Ravi Traders has a cheque drawn on HDFC Bank by Sudha. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, who is the 'drawee' of this cheque?
- Tara Enterprises, a company, issued a cheque that was dishonoured under Section 138. The notice was served and payment was not made. Which s…
- Nisha Textiles, a company, issued a cheque that was dishonoured and Section 138 was attracted. Which statement about liability under Section…