Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Public sector governance

A city health authority is funded by central government, regulated by a national inspectorate, and used by local patients. Its chief executive reports performance to the central government department but rarely consults patient groups, even though patients are directly affected by service quality. Under Mendelow's power-interest matrix, how should patient groups with high interest but low power be treated, and what does the chief executive's approach imply?

Patient groups are high-interest, low-power stakeholders, so Mendelow's matrix says keep them informed. The chief executive's focus on central government alone implies weak accountability to service users, creating reputational and legitimacy risks if patients' concerns are ignored or they gain allies.

  1. AKeep informed, since they are a high-interest, low-power group whose neglect risks reputational and legitimacy problemsCorrect
  2. BManage closely, as they hold the highest power to block strategy
  3. CMinimal effort, because low power means no need for communication
  4. DKeep satisfied, since they control the authority's funding

Explanation

High interest and low power corresponds to 'keep informed'. Patients cannot control funding or block decisions, so they are not 'manage closely' or 'keep satisfied'. Ignoring them is not 'minimal effort' because they are highly interested, and neglect weakens accountability to service users and can create legitimacy risks, especially if they coalesce with others.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Public sector governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Public sector governance questions