Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Finance · Corporate governance and the regulation of companies

A company has a promoter family holding 60% of shares and professional managers running operations. Minority shareholders complain that the promoters approve related-party contracts at above-market prices. Which governance problem is this, and which response best addresses it?

This is a conflict between controlling promoters and minority shareholders, where related-party deals expropriate value. The best response is requiring approval by independent directors and disinterested shareholders, which limits the promoters' ability to push through above-market contracts for their own benefit.

  1. AA conflict between controlling and minority shareholders; require independent director and disinterested shareholder approval of related-party transactionsCorrect
  2. BA conflict between shareholders and lenders; increase the debt covenants
  3. CA conflict between managers and employees; introduce an employee share scheme
  4. DA conflict between the company and the tax authority; hire a tax adviser
  5. A conflict between auditor and management; rotate the audit partner

Explanation

Where ownership is concentrated, the main agency problem is expropriation of minorities by controlling shareholders, for example via related-party deals. Independent director review and approval by disinterested shareholders directly constrains this. The other responses address different relationships and do not tackle the pricing of related-party contracts.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate governance and the regulation of companies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Corporate governance and the regulation of companies questions