Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Actuaries Act, 2006 and IAI governance

A complaint alleges that an actuary, Meera, produced a valuation report in breach of professional standards. The IAI wants the matter handled fairly, with separation between those who investigate and those who decide. Which governance feature best supports this aim?

Separate disciplinary machinery, where the investigating body differs from the adjudicating body and involved members recuse themselves, best supports fairness. It follows natural justice by avoiding bias. A single person performing every role, or the accused choosing the panel, would undermine impartiality.

  1. ASeparate disciplinary machinery, with the investigating body distinct from the body that adjudicates and with Council members who were involved recusing themselvesCorrect
  2. BThe President alone investigates, decides and imposes the penalty
  3. CThe complaint is passed to the media for public judgement
  4. DMeera is asked to appoint the members who will hear the complaint
  5. The matter is dropped since reports are never subject to review

Explanation

Natural justice requires that no person be a judge in their own cause and that the accused is heard by an unbiased body. Separating investigation from adjudication, and recusal of conflicted members, achieves this. Concentrating all roles in one person or letting the accused choose the panel defeats fairness.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Actuaries Act, 2006 and IAI governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Actuaries Act, 2006 and IAI governanceFree diagnostic mock

More Actuaries Act, 2006 and IAI governance questions