CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Bankruptcy Order for Individuals and Partnership Firms
A debtor obtains a moratorium order under Part III. A suit that the debtor would have filed in his own name has a limitation period running during the moratorium. What does section 179(3) provide?
The period during which the moratorium is in force is excluded when computing limitation for suits or applications in the debtor's name. Section 179(3) applies this notwithstanding the Limitation Act, 1963, so the moratorium time does not count against the debtor.
- AThe period during which the moratorium is in place is excluded when computing limitationCorrect
- BLimitation continues to run unaffected by the moratorium
- CLimitation is extended by exactly one year
- DThe suit is barred permanently
Explanation
Section 179(3) says that, notwithstanding the Limitation Act, 1963, in computing limitation for any suit or application in the name and on behalf of a debtor for which a moratorium has been ordered, the moratorium period is excluded. A fixed one-year extension is not what the text provides.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Bankruptcy Order for Individuals and Partnership Firms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Bankruptcy Order for Individuals and Partnership Firms questions
- A bankruptcy order is passed on 1 April against Gupta & Sons, a firm with partners Rohit and Sanjay. Axis-type secured creditor Bharat Bank …
- Mr. Desai, an individual debtor, died after the Adjudicating Authority passed an order permitting creditors to apply for bankruptcy. Arjun F…
- Sunita Traders, a partnership firm, defaulted on a loan. The default amount is Rs 80,000, and the Central Government has not notified any hi…
- A bankruptcy order was passed against Karan on 1 March. Bank X, a secured creditor, takes no step to realise its security. Under section 128…
- Kiran Joshi, an undischarged bankrupt, wants to know the legal consequence of the Tribunal's discharge order for the process. Which statemen…
- Anil's Part III matter involves a firm, Sharma & Sons, which has several partners and carries on business in partnership but was never regis…