FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models
A desk calibrates a Vasicek model dr = k(θ − r)dt + σ dW with k = 0.25, θ = 4%, and current short rate r0 = 2%. Using the expected-rate formula E[r(t)] = θ + (r0 − θ)e^(−kt), what is the expected short rate in 4 years? (e^(−1) = 0.3679)
The expected short rate is about 3.26%. With k×t equal to 1, the gap of minus 2% from the long-run mean shrinks by a factor of 0.3679, leaving minus 0.74%, so the expected rate is 4% minus 0.74%, which equals 3.26%.
- A2.74%
- B3.26%Correct
- C3.63%
- D3.37%
Explanation
kt = 0.25×4 = 1, so e^(−1)=0.3679. E[r] = 4% + (2% − 4%)(0.3679) = 4% − 0.7358% = 3.264%, about 3.26%. Option A (2.74%) adds the deviation to r0 wrongly or flips the sign, and option C ignores much of the reversion.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models questions
- In a Gauss+ framework, the short rate is the sum of two mean-reverting Gaussian factors, x1 with a slow mean-reversion speed and x2 with a f…
- A risk manager compares two Vasicek calibrations that share the same θ and σ. Calibration A has k = 0.10 and Calibration B has k = 0.80. Whi…
- A risk manager is calibrating a Vasicek model in an environment where the current short rate is 0.5% and the long-run mean is 1.5%. A collea…
- An analyst calibrates the Vasicek mean-reversion speed to k = 0.35 per year using historical short-rate data. What is the half-life of a dev…
- A analyst notes that the Vasicek model assumes constant σ and normally distributed short rate changes. Which is a direct consequence of this…
- A risk analyst describes the Gauss+ model used for term structure analysis. Which statement best characterizes its structure?