Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Regression Hedging and Principal Component Analysis

A desk wants to hedge a bond portfolio against level, slope and curvature moves using principal component analysis rather than a single DV01 number. Which description of the approach is correct?

The desk should measure the portfolio's exposure to each main principal component (level, slope, curvature) and size hedge positions so net exposure to each is about zero. This goes beyond DV01, which only covers a parallel shift.

  1. AHedge a single parallel shift because the first component always explains all variation
  2. BCompute exposure to each of the main principal components and choose hedge instruments so the net exposure to each is approximately zeroCorrect
  3. CUse only the third component, since it captures the largest variance
  4. DChoose hedges so that the components are made correlated with each other

Explanation

PCA hedging measures the portfolio's sensitivity to each major factor (level, slope, curvature) and sizes hedges to neutralize each. The first component does not explain all variance, the largest-variance component is the first (not the third), and components are uncorrelated by construction.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression Hedging and Principal Component Analysis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Regression Hedging and Principal Component Analysis questions