FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags
A due diligence team finds that a fund claiming to trade S&P 100 stocks and index options reports that its option positions would have required notional volume exceeding the total open interest in the listed S&P 100 options market. What is the most appropriate interpretation?
A strategy that would need option volume beyond the whole listed market's open interest is not feasible at that scale. This is a strategy capacity red flag, and any OTC explanation must be independently verified with counterparties rather than simply accepted.
- AThe manager is probably using over-the-counter options, so the claim is fully explained
- BThe strategy as described appears infeasible at its reported scale, which is a strategy capacity red flagCorrect
- CThe excess is a normal result of leverage in options strategies
- DThe finding is irrelevant if reported returns are stable
Explanation
If required trades exceed the market's total capacity, the stated strategy cannot be executed as described. While OTC options could be a possible explanation, it must be verified through counterparties and confirmations rather than assumed. Stable returns do not cure an infeasible strategy.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags questions
- A fund of funds allocated to a manager after reviewing the manager's reported returns, which showed only 4 down months in 15 years and low v…
- An allocator reviewing a hedge fund that reports steady monthly returns of about 1% with almost no down months learns that the fund's entire…
- Which practice would most effectively address the risk that a feeder fund cannot verify the existence of the master fund's assets?
- A due diligence analyst reviews a fund that claims to run a split-strike conversion strategy (long equities hedged with collars) and reports…
- A feeder fund places all client assets with one investment manager, and its own staff perform no independent trade reconciliation, relying i…
- A feeder fund manager charges investors a 1.5% management fee on assets while the master manager charges only trading commissions. A due dil…