CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law
A forensic investigation into a fraud case was pending in a Delhi court on 30 June 2024, before the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 commenced. Which rule of evidence governs that pending proceeding?
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 governs. Under the repeal and savings provision, any proceeding, trial or inquiry pending immediately before the Adhiniyam's commencement continues under the 1872 Act as it stood then, as though the new Adhiniyam had not come into force.
- AThe Adhiniyam, as it is the later law
- BThe Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as in force immediately before commencementCorrect
- CRules chosen freely by the presiding judge
- DThe Adhiniyam for documents and the 1872 Act for witnesses
Explanation
Section 170 repeals the 1872 Act but saves pending applications, trials, inquiries, investigations, proceedings or appeals, which are dealt with under the 1872 Act as in force before commencement, as if the Adhiniyam had not come into force. A split approach is not provided.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Forensic Audit and Indian Evidence Law questions
- Which of the following is NOT among the kinds of pending matters that Section 170(2) of the Adhiniyam saves for treatment under the Indian E…
- During a fraud probe, a forensic auditor relies on a document produced before the Court that purports to be a record of a witness's evidence…
- In a fraud case, counsel argues that because a deposition record signed by a Magistrate is produced, the Court must presume its contents are…
- In a dispute audited by a forensic team, Kiran Traders, a party to an attested loan deed required by law to be attested, admits in court tha…
- In a fraud probe, Rakesh Agarwal is the sole party sued on a guarantee deed required by law to be attested. In court Rakesh admits that he e…
- A lender sues on an attested loan agreement required by law to be attested. The only attesting witness is called under Section 67 but says h…