Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Global Drivers of Private Credit

A fund has a liability-driven target return of 6.0%. Public investment-grade bonds yield 3.5%, public high-yield bonds yield 6.0% with 25% annualised volatility of mark-to-market returns, and private loans yield 6.0% with reported volatility of 8% due to infrequent appraisal-based valuation. A risk analyst warns the committee about comparing the two on reported volatility. What is the core issue?

The issue is valuation smoothing. Infrequent appraisal-based marks understate private credit's true volatility and correlation with markets, so its risk-adjusted appeal looks better than public high yield with the same yield; returns should be unsmoothed before comparison.

  1. ASmoothed valuations understate private credit's true risk, so its risk-adjusted appeal is overstated relative to public high yieldCorrect
  2. BPrivate loans always have higher true volatility than high-yield bonds by construction of the coupon
  3. CHigh-yield bonds cannot meet the 6.0% target because of their coupon structure
  4. DReported volatility is overstated for private loans because of daily pricing

Explanation

Appraisal-based marks lag market conditions and dampen measured volatility and correlations, making private credit look safer per unit of yield. Adjusting for smoothing (for example unsmoothing returns) is needed for a fair comparison. Option 'always higher' is unsupported, and the loans are not priced daily.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Global Drivers of Private Credit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More The Global Drivers of Private Credit questions