FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Performance Evaluation
A fund has an active risk (tracking error) of 4% and a benchmark return of 6%. Its portfolio return is 8.0%. A second fund has tracking error of 2% and a portfolio return of 7.2% against the same benchmark. Which statement is correct when comparing them on the information ratio?
Fund 2 has the higher information ratio. Fund 1 scores 0.50 (2.0 percent active return over 4 percent tracking error), while Fund 2 scores 0.60 (1.2 percent over 2 percent), so Fund 2 earns more active return per unit of active risk.
- AFund 1 has the higher IR because its active return is larger
- BFund 2 has the higher IR because it earns more active return per unit of active riskCorrect
- CBoth funds have the same IR
- DFund 2 has the lower IR because its total return is lower
Explanation
Fund 1 IR = 2.0/4 = 0.50. Fund 2 IR = 1.2/2 = 0.60. Fund 2 delivers more active return per unit of tracking error. Choosing Fund 1 on raw active return ignores the risk taken.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Evaluation questions
- A fund has an active risk (tracking error) of 3% per year relative to its benchmark. Assuming active returns are normally distributed with a…
- A manager's stated mandate is U.S. large-cap value, but returns-based style analysis over rolling windows shows a growing weight in small-ca…
- A portfolio manager's performance is compared with a benchmark. Which of the following is a required property of a valid benchmark under sta…
- A fund returned 12% in a year when the risk-free rate was 3% and the fund's return standard deviation was 18%. The market portfolio returned…
- Using the same data as a standard Brinson attribution, a benchmark has Equity 50% at 10% and Bonds 50% at 4% (total benchmark return 7%). Th…
- A fund returned 12% over a year while the risk-free rate was 4%. The fund's standard deviation of returns was 16% and its beta against the m…