FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly)
A fund manager builds a betting-against-beta (BAB) portfolio. The long leg holds low-beta stocks with a beta of 0.5 and the short leg holds high-beta stocks with a beta of 1.5. To make the portfolio market-neutral, the manager scales each leg to a beta of one. What are the leverage factors applied to the long and short legs respectively?
The long leg is levered 2.0 times and the short leg is scaled to 0.667 times. Each leg is divided by its own beta, so both legs have beta of one and the long-short portfolio has zero net market beta.
- A2.0 on the long leg and 0.667 on the short legCorrect
- B0.5 on the long leg and 1.5 on the short leg
- C0.667 on the long leg and 2.0 on the short leg
- D1.0 on both legs
Explanation
Each leg is divided by its beta: long 1/0.5 = 2.0, short 1/1.5 = 0.667. Then the long beta is 2.0×0.5 = 1 and the short beta is 0.667×1.5 = 1, so net beta is zero. Option B multiplies by beta instead of dividing, and C swaps the legs.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alpha (and the Low-Risk Anomaly) questions
- Behavioral finance explanations of the low-risk anomaly often cite a lottery preference. Which statement best describes how this explanation…
- A common behavioral and institutional explanation for the low-risk anomaly is that many investors face leverage constraints. Which of the fo…
- A portfolio returned 11.0% over a year. The risk-free rate was 3.0%, the portfolio's beta to the market was 1.2, and the market return was 8…
- Under the fundamental law of active management, the expected information ratio is approximately IR = IC × √BR. A manager has an information …
- Under the CAPM, which statement about a security that plots above the security market line is correct?
- A portfolio returned 11.0% over a year. The risk-free rate was 3.0%, the portfolio beta was 1.2, and the market return was 9.0%. Using the C…