Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Factors

A fund manager markets a minimum-variance smart beta strategy. Compared with its cap-weighted parent index, which feature should a risk manager expect?

A minimum-variance strategy typically gains exposure to the low-volatility anomaly, with lower beta, defensive sector tilts and possible concentration. It will show tracking error against the cap-weighted parent index rather than matching it, and it does not overweight high-volatility stocks.

  1. AHigher market beta, because it overweights high-volatility stocks
  2. BExposure to the low-volatility anomaly, with a tendency toward defensive sectors and possible concentrationCorrect
  3. CReturns that are perfectly correlated with the parent index
  4. DZero tracking error versus the parent index

Explanation

Minimum-variance optimization favors low-volatility, low-beta stocks, which captures the low-risk anomaly but often concentrates in defensive sectors and can create meaningful tracking error. Beta is typically below one, not above, and correlation with the parent is not perfect.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Factors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Factors questions