FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Factors
A portfolio manager regresses a fund's monthly excess returns on the market, size and value factors. The regression gives an R-squared of 0.85 and a total return variance of 400 (in %-squared units). How much of the fund's variance is attributable to idiosyncratic (non-factor) risk?
Idiosyncratic variance is the unexplained share of total variance: (1 - 0.85) x 400 = 60. The figure of 340 is the factor-explained variance, so it is the wrong component to report as residual risk.
- A60Correct
- B85
- C340
- D15
Explanation
Idiosyncratic variance equals (1 - R-squared) times total variance: 0.15 x 400 = 60. Option 340 is the factor-explained variance (0.85 x 400), a mix-up of which part is residual. Option 85 and 15 are raw percentages, not variances.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Factors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Factors questions
- Which description best matches the quality factor as used in equity factor investing?
- An analyst runs a regression of a portfolio's excess returns on the market factor and finds a beta of 0.70 and a positive alpha. The portfol…
- A portfolio has an expected return of 9.5% and a beta of 1.25. The risk-free rate is 2% and the market's expected return is 7%. What is the …
- A risk manager reviews a momentum strategy that buys the past 12-month winners (skipping the most recent month) and sells the losers. After …
- A long-only smart beta fund tracks a benchmark and holds a value-tilted portfolio. Its active weights relative to the benchmark are: Stock X…
- An investor wants a smart beta portfolio that harvests the low-volatility factor but is concerned about unintended bets. Which risk is most …