IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Introduction to extreme value theory
A GEV distribution has shape parameter ξ = 0.4. Which statement about the tail of this distribution is correct?
With ξ = 0.4 > 0 the GEV is of Fréchet type, with a heavy polynomial tail. Moments of order 1/ξ = 2.5 or above are infinite, so, for example, the third moment does not exist. Weibull needs a negative shape and Gumbel needs zero.
- AIt is of Weibull type with a finite upper endpoint
- BIt is of Gumbel type with an exponentially decaying tail
- CIt is of Fréchet type with a heavy tail, so some higher moments are infiniteCorrect
- DIt is of Fréchet type, and all moments are finite
- It is of Weibull type with a heavy tail
Explanation
A positive shape parameter gives the Fréchet type, which has a polynomially decaying (heavy) tail. Moments of order 1/ξ or higher do not exist; here 1/0.4 = 2.5, so the third moment is infinite. Weibull requires ξ < 0 and Gumbel is ξ = 0.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Introduction to extreme value theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Introduction to extreme value theory questions
- Block maxima of a loss variable are fitted with a generalised extreme value distribution with shape parameter ξ. For which value of ξ is the…
- Which statement about the Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem is correct?
- A GEV distribution has location mu = 50, scale sigma = 10 and shape xi = -0.5. Its distribution function is F(x) = exp(-[1 + xi(x-mu)/sigma]…
- Losses are independent and uniformly distributed on (0, 1) (in Rs crore). For a block of n = 5 losses, what is the expected value of the blo…
- Block maxima of daily losses are modelled by a GEV distribution with shape ξ > 0 after suitable normalisation. Which statement is correct?
- A reinsurer uses annual block maxima of fire losses. Which is a recognised drawback of the block maxima method compared with peaks over thre…