Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Reporting

A global bank has several trading desks that record the same counterparty under different legal-entity names and codes. As a result, the group view of exposure to that counterparty is understated in aggregated reports. What is the most effective remediation aligned with strong data architecture?

Create a single authoritative source of counterparty reference data with a unique legal entity identifier and parent-child hierarchy mapping used by all systems. This fixes the root cause so exposures aggregate consistently, whereas manual adjustments, slower reporting or footnotes leave understated exposure and error risk.

  1. AAdd a manual adjustment each month in the board report to reflect estimated missing exposure
  2. BReduce the reporting frequency so reconciliation can be done more thoroughly
  3. CEstablish a single golden source with a unique legal entity identifier and hierarchy mapping used across all systemsCorrect
  4. DAllow each desk to keep its own naming convention but document the differences in a footnote

Explanation

The root cause is inconsistent reference data. A common counterparty identifier and hierarchy maintained in a single authoritative source lets exposures aggregate automatically and consistently. Manual adjustments are error-prone and not scalable, lower frequency harms timeliness, and footnotes leave the understatement in place.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Reporting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Reporting questions