Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits

A highly leveraged firm's shareholders approve a plan to replace a low-risk project with a much riskier one offering a higher potential payoff, without informing bondholders. This situation is best described as a conflict between:

This is a shareholder-creditor conflict over risk-taking. Shareholders capture the upside of the riskier project, while creditors with fixed claims bear the greater default risk, particularly in a highly leveraged firm. The scenario involves neither pay nor majority-minority treatment.

  1. Amanagers and employees over compensation structure
  2. Bshareholders and creditors over the firm's risk-takingCorrect
  3. Cmajority shareholders and minority shareholders over dividends

Explanation

Shareholders gain from upside of risky projects while creditors have a fixed claim and bear downside risk, especially with high leverage. This shifts risk and value from creditors to shareholders, a shareholder-creditor conflict. No compensation or minority issue is described.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits questions