CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Administrative Laws
A licensing authority has power to impose 'such conditions as it considers necessary' on a film exhibition licence. It imposes a condition requiring the exhibitor to donate a sum to a political party. A court strikes it down. Which reasoning is most accurate?
The condition is invalid because discretion must serve the purposes of the enabling statute. A donation to a political party has no connection with regulating film exhibition, so imposing it is an improper purpose. The wide words 'considers necessary' do not make the decision immune from judicial review.
- AThe condition is invalid because discretion must be exercised to further the purposes of the enabling statute, and the donation has no nexus with themCorrect
- BThe condition is invalid only because it was not published in the Gazette
- CThe condition is valid because the words 'considers necessary' make the decision unreviewable
- DThe condition is valid because exhibitors accept licences voluntarily
Explanation
Wide words in a statute are still read as confined by the Act's object. A condition unrelated to regulating exhibitions is outside the purpose and is therefore ultra vires or an improper purpose. Option C is wrong because subjective satisfaction does not oust review where the power is used for an alien purpose.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Administrative Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Administrative Laws questions
- A municipal commissioner has power to grant or refuse a trade licence 'as he thinks fit'. He refuses an application only because he dislikes…
- A government hospital doctor employed by a State negligently performs a surgery in the ordinary course of duty, and the patient suffers harm…
- An officer is empowered to cancel a dealer's registration if he is 'satisfied' that the dealer has committed a violation. He cancels it rely…
- An authority passed an order against an employee without giving any hearing, and the order is attacked on the ground of violation of natural…
- A university disciplinary committee includes Prof. Mehta, whose own research paper was allegedly plagiarised by the student facing inquiry. …
- A rule-making authority under a statute is told it may grant exemptions 'in public interest'. It adopts a fixed policy of rejecting every ex…