Skip to content

CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Administrative Laws

A licensing authority has power to impose 'such conditions as it considers necessary' on a film exhibition licence. It imposes a condition requiring the exhibitor to donate a sum to a political party. A court strikes it down. Which reasoning is most accurate?

The condition is invalid because discretion must serve the purposes of the enabling statute. A donation to a political party has no connection with regulating film exhibition, so imposing it is an improper purpose. The wide words 'considers necessary' do not make the decision immune from judicial review.

  1. AThe condition is invalid because discretion must be exercised to further the purposes of the enabling statute, and the donation has no nexus with themCorrect
  2. BThe condition is invalid only because it was not published in the Gazette
  3. CThe condition is valid because the words 'considers necessary' make the decision unreviewable
  4. DThe condition is valid because exhibitors accept licences voluntarily

Explanation

Wide words in a statute are still read as confined by the Act's object. A condition unrelated to regulating exhibitions is outside the purpose and is therefore ultra vires or an improper purpose. Option C is wrong because subjective satisfaction does not oust review where the power is used for an alien purpose.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Administrative Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Administrative Laws questions