Skip to content

ACCA Applied Knowledge · Business and Technology · Environmental and sustainability factors

A listed company publishes a glossy sustainability report highlighting small recycling projects but omits a recent major pollution incident. Which criticism is most relevant?

The main criticism is greenwashing: the report stresses minor positive initiatives while hiding a significant pollution incident, so it is neither balanced nor complete. Stakeholders are misled about true environmental performance, which damages credibility and trust in the company's sustainability disclosures.

  1. AThe report suffers from greenwashing and lacks balance and completenessCorrect
  2. BThe report breaches the accruals concept in the financial statements
  3. CThe report is invalid because sustainability reports must be audited by regulators

Explanation

Selectively promoting positive actions while omitting a significant negative event misleads stakeholders about performance, which is greenwashing and a failure of balance and completeness. The accruals concept relates to financial statements, and sustainability reports are not universally required to be audited by regulators.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Environmental and sustainability factors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Environmental and sustainability factors questions