Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Professional and ethical behaviour in corporate reporting

A listed entity's integrated report highlights only favourable environmental metrics and omits a regulator's fine that is material to stakeholders' decisions. Which assessment is most appropriate from the perspective of the public interest in corporate reporting?

The reporting is inappropriate. Leaving out a material regulatory fine while stressing good news makes the report biased and incomplete, so it is not a faithful representation. Stakeholders rely on balanced information, so voluntary status does not excuse omission, and the dividend is irrelevant to materiality.

  1. AAcceptable, because integrated reports are voluntary and need not be balanced
  2. BAcceptable, because only the financial statements must be faithful
  3. CInappropriate, because omitting material adverse information undermines faithful representation and the balance expected by stakeholdersCorrect
  4. DInappropriate only if the fine exceeds the entity's annual dividend

Explanation

Information that could influence stakeholder decisions must be complete, neutral and free from error to be faithfully represented. Selective disclosure of positives is bias, whether or not the report is voluntary. Materiality depends on influence on decisions, not on comparison with the dividend.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional and ethical behaviour in corporate reporting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Professional and ethical behaviour in corporate reporting questions