FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Value at Risk
A loan portfolio has exposure of USD 500 million, LGD of 40% and a one-year PD of 2% per loan. A Vasicek model gives a 99.9% worst-case default rate of 8%. The risk manager wants the unexpected loss, that is, the credit VaR in excess of expected loss, as the economic capital figure. What is it?
The unexpected loss is USD 12 million. The 99.9% credit VaR is 500m × 40% × 8% = 16m, and expected loss is 500m × 40% × 2% = 4m. Capital for unexpected loss is the difference, 12m, not the full 16m VaR.
- AUSD 16 million
- BUSD 12 millionCorrect
- CUSD 4 million
- DUSD 20 million
Explanation
Credit VaR at 99.9% = 500 × 0.40 × 8% = USD 16m. Expected loss = 500 × 0.40 × 2% = USD 4m. Unexpected loss = 16 - 4 = USD 12m. USD 16m ignores the subtraction of expected loss, and USD 4m is only the expected loss.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Value at Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credit Value at Risk questions
- In CreditMetrics, the equity-return (asset-return) correlation between two obligors is used to derive joint migration probabilities. How are…
- Under CreditMetrics, a bond has a one-year horizon. The probabilities and revalued bond values at the horizon are: upgrade, 10% probability,…
- A risk analyst at a bank is explaining why the credit loss distribution of a large loan portfolio is typically skewed to the right with a fa…
- A risk manager compares CreditMetrics with a KMV-type structural model for a corporate loan book. Which statement correctly describes a key …
- A bank's CreditRisk+ output shows expected loss of USD 20 million and 99.9% credit VaR of USD 140 million. What is the unexpected loss measu…
- When CreditMetrics revalues a non-defaulted bond at the end of the horizon after a migration to a new rating, which inputs are used?