Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Benchmarking Returns

A manager's portfolio returned 11.0% and the chosen benchmark returned 8.0%. The benchmark's holdings, however, have an average beta of 0.8 versus the portfolio's 1.2, and market return was 9.0% with a risk-free rate of 3.0%. Which conclusion is most appropriate?

The benchmark is mismatched in risk, so the 3.0% raw excess return partly reflects the portfolio's higher beta. CAPM implies about 10.2% for beta 1.2 versus 7.8% for beta 0.8, leaving only roughly 0.8% attributable to skill.

  1. AThe excess return of 3.0% is a valid measure of skill because both are equity portfolios
  2. BThe benchmark is mismatched in risk, so the 3.0% excess return partly reflects higher risk exposureCorrect
  3. CThe benchmark should be replaced by the risk-free rate, giving an excess return of 8.0%

Explanation

Expected return under CAPM for beta 1.2 is 3+1.2×6=10.2%, while for beta 0.8 it is 3+0.8×6=7.8%. Most of the 3.0% active return is explained by the extra risk: 11.0−10.2=0.8% is the risk-adjusted excess. The mismatched risk makes the raw comparison misleading.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Benchmarking Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Benchmarking Returns questions