FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Commodity Forwards and Futures
A market shows a commodity futures curve where longer-dated contracts trade at lower prices than nearby contracts. Which explanation is most consistent with this backwardation within the cost-of-carry framework?
Backwardation is consistent with a convenience yield greater than the sum of the interest rate and storage costs. Then the net cost of carry is negative, so longer-dated forwards are priced below nearby ones. Large storage costs would instead produce contango.
- AThe convenience yield exceeds interest plus storage costsCorrect
- BStorage costs exceed the convenience yield and interest rate
- CThe risk-free rate is zero
- DFutures prices always converge upward to spot at maturity
Explanation
Forward price F = S e^((r+u−y)T) declines with T when y > r + u, which is backwardation. High storage costs would produce contango. A zero rate alone does not produce a falling curve.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Commodity Forwards and Futures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Commodity Forwards and Futures questions
- A commodity has spot price $50, r = 4% continuously compounded, no storage costs, and a convenience yield of 6% per year. Using F = S·exp((r…
- A gold dealer observes a spot price of USD 2,000 per ounce. The risk-free rate is 5% per year (continuously compounded), and storage costs a…
- A jewelry maker wants to lock in the price of gold it will purchase in six months. Which position in gold futures best achieves this objecti…
- Gold spot is USD 1,900 per ounce. The one-year continuously compounded risk-free rate is 5% and the one-year gold lease rate is 2%. The one-…
- Gold has a spot price of USD 2,000 per ounce. The continuously compounded risk-free rate is 4% per year, and storage costs are 0.5% per year…
- A copper fabricator observes that the nearby copper futures price is higher than the price of the contract maturing in six months, and the s…