CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Quality Control
A mid-sized CA firm is drafting its quality control manual. Which of the following documentation requirements for an engagement quality control review is consistent with SQC 1?
SQC 1 requires documenting that the firm's review procedures were performed, that the review was completed before the report was issued, and that the reviewer is unaware of any unresolved matters suggesting the engagement team's significant judgments and conclusions were inappropriate. Dates of signing alone or post-report reviews do not satisfy this.
- ADocumentation that the review procedures required by the firm's policies were performed, that the review was completed before the report was issued, and that the reviewer is not aware of any unresolved matters suggesting the team's significant judgments and conclusions were inappropriateCorrect
- BDocumentation only of the date on which the audit report was signed by the engagement partner
- CDocumentation that the review was completed within thirty days after the report date, together with the reviewer's fee
- DDocumentation that all disagreements between the engagement team and the client were resolved in the client's favour
Explanation
SQC 1 requires documentation of three things: that the firm's required review procedures were performed, that the review was completed before the report was issued, and that the reviewer knows of no unresolved matters that would make the team's significant judgments or conclusions seem inappropriate. The other options describe items that SQC 1 does not require, and the second and third are inconsistent with its terms.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Quality Control shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Quality Control questions
- Iyer & Co. completed the quality control review of the audit of Bharat Steels Ltd. The reviewer's file note says only: 'Reviewed, all fine.'…
- While auditing a listed company, the engagement partner of Iyer & Partners frequently consults the appointed engagement quality control revi…
- Mehta & Rao, a CA firm, is auditing the financial statements of Sundaram Foods Ltd, a listed company. The engagement partner proposes to iss…
- Rao & Co. is auditing Kaveri Foods Ltd, a listed company. The audit report is signed and issued on 10 June. The engagement quality control r…
- A firm's quality control manual states that an engagement quality control review is performed only for audits of listed entities and for no …
- Iyer & Partners is a mid-sized firm. Its quality control manual says engagement quality control reviews will be performed only for listed en…