FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables
A model with k = 3 regressors on n = 25 observations has R-squared of 0.40. Adding two more regressors raises R-squared to 0.44 with the same sample. What is the change in adjusted R-squared?
Adjusted R-squared falls from about 0.314 to about 0.293, a decrease of roughly 0.02. Although R-squared rises by 0.04, the two extra regressors use up degrees of freedom and the small gain does not compensate, so the adjusted measure declines.
- AAn increase of about 0.04
- BA decrease of about 0.02Correct
- CA decrease of about 0.04
- DNo change
Explanation
Original: 1 - 0.60 × 24/21 = 1 - 0.6857 = 0.3143. New with k = 5: 1 - 0.56 × 24/19 = 1 - 0.7074 = 0.2926. Change = -0.0217, about -0.02. The increase of 0.04 mistakes the R-squared change for the adjusted change.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables questions
- The true model is Y = 1.0 + 2.0·X1 + 3.0·X2 + e. An analyst omits X2 and regresses Y on X1 only. In the sample, the regression of X2 on X1 g…
- A model of portfolio returns omits a relevant variable X2 that is positively correlated with the included variable X1, and X2 has a positive…
- In a multiple regression, a researcher finds that two explanatory variables have a sample correlation of 0.98, the overall F-test is highly …
- Which statement about the OLS estimators in a multiple regression is correct when the classical assumptions hold except that the error varia…
- An analyst omits a relevant explanatory variable that is positively correlated with an included variable, and whose true coefficient is posi…
- Model A has k = 2 regressors and R-squared of 0.500. Model B adds 3 more regressors (k = 5) and has R-squared of 0.530. Both use n = 31 obse…