IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Valuing benefit guarantees using simulation
A Monte Carlo estimate of a put-style maturity guarantee uses 10,000 paths. The mean discounted payoff is Rs 12 and the sample standard deviation of the discounted payoffs is Rs 30. What is the approximate 95% confidence interval for the true cost (use 1.96)?
The standard error is 30 divided by 100, which is 0.3. Multiplying by 1.96 gives a half-width of 0.588, so the interval is Rs 12 plus or minus 0.588.
- ARs 12 ± 0.588Correct
- BRs 12 ± 5.88
- CRs 12 ± 58.8
- DRs 12 ± 0.3
- Rs 12 ± 1.96
Explanation
Standard error = 30/sqrt(10000) = 0.3. The 95% half-width = 1.96 × 0.3 = 0.588. Using the standard deviation without dividing by the square root of N gives 58.8, which is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Valuing benefit guarantees using simulation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Valuing benefit guarantees using simulation questions
- An insurer uses stochastic simulation to value a maturity guarantee on a unit-linked policy. It wants a market-consistent value consistent w…
- A unit-linked maturity guarantee promises the policyholder the greater of the unit fund value and a guaranteed sum at maturity. From the ins…
- For which purpose would an insurer most appropriately use real-world rather than risk-neutral scenarios?
- An insurer sold a single-premium policy with a 5-year guarantee of Rs 100 per Rs 100 invested in an equity fund. The guarantee is valued as …
- A life insurer values a guarantee at a future time horizon using nested (stochastic-on-stochastic) simulation: 1,000 outer real-world scenar…
- An actuary values a maturity guarantee on a unit-linked contract using 10,000 independent stochastic simulations of the fund value. She want…