Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues

A multinational's finance director is advising the board on a proposed bond issue whose proceeds will fund a plant upgrade. The company wants to label it a 'green bond' because the plant will cut emissions. Which action best reflects the senior financial adviser's role in protecting the company's ESG credibility?

The adviser should ensure proceeds are ring-fenced for eligible projects, with measurable targets and independent verification. This supports credibility and avoids greenwashing risk. Labelling after trivial reductions, hiding use of proceeds, or treating the matter as pure marketing would expose the company to reputational and financial harm.

  1. ALabel the bond green as long as the plant upgrade reduces emissions by any amount
  2. BConfirm that proceeds will be ring-fenced for eligible projects, with measurable targets and independent verification of reportingCorrect
  3. CLeave the labelling decision to the marketing department because it is a branding matter
  4. DAvoid disclosing the use of proceeds so competitors cannot copy the strategy

Explanation

A credible green label depends on defined eligible use of proceeds, tracking and external verification. Labelling on any small reduction risks greenwashing, and withholding use-of-proceeds information undermines the label's purpose. Treating it as marketing ignores the adviser's responsibility for financial and reputational risk.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issuesFree diagnostic mock

More Corporate environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues questions