CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Arbitration Procedure, Appointment of an Arbitrator and Other Aspects
A Mumbai company and a Singapore company are in an international commercial arbitration; their agreement gives no appointment procedure and they fail to agree on a sole arbitrator within thirty days of the request. Which statement is correct under section 11?
In an international commercial arbitration, the request for appointment is made to the Supreme Court. Where the parties belong to different nationalities, it may appoint a sole or third arbitrator of a nationality different from theirs.
- AThe appointment request goes to the Supreme Court, which may appoint an arbitrator of a nationality other than those of the partiesCorrect
- BThe appointment request goes to the High Court within whose limits the principal civil court sits, and nationality is irrelevant
- CThe Chief Justice of the nearest High Court must appoint a person of Indian nationality
- DThe appointment may be made by either party unilaterally
Explanation
Section 11(12)(a) treats references to the Supreme Court or High Court as the Supreme Court in international commercial arbitration, and section 11(9) lets it appoint a sole or third arbitrator of a nationality other than the parties' where they belong to different nationalities. The High Court option reflects domestic arbitration.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Arbitration Procedure, Appointment of an Arbitrator and Other Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Arbitration Procedure, Appointment of an Arbitrator and Other Aspects questions
- A tribunal in an arbitration between Nirmal Pharma and Gupta Distributors passes an interim order under Section 17 directing Gupta to deposi…
- Under a contract between Anand Pharma Ltd (Ahmedabad) and Bhatia Logistics LLP (Pune), the clause says the sole arbitrator will be agreed by…
- An agreement between Rao Pharma Ltd and Singh Logistics provides that the arbitrator must be a retired High Court judge with commercial law …
- A High Court designate is hearing a Section 11 application by Raghav Steels against Vindhya Metals. Vindhya argues that the contract is time…
- Nair Exports (India) and Hoffmann GmbH (Germany) are in an international commercial arbitration with no agreed appointment mechanism for a s…
- Orion Steel Ltd (Jamshedpur) files an application under Section 11 before a High Court to appoint an arbitrator against Pragati Infra Ltd. P…