Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Reporting

A payments firm has defined an impact tolerance for its payment processing service of a maximum disruption of 4 hours. During a scenario test, the service was restored after 6 hours, with the delay caused by a third-party hosting provider. Which reporting action is most appropriate?

The firm should report the test as a breach of its 4-hour impact tolerance, name the third-party hosting dependency as the cause, and track remediation to senior management. Eventual restoration, loosening the tolerance or excluding external causes would hide a real resilience weakness.

  1. AReport the test as successful because the service was eventually restored
  2. BReport a tolerance breach in the test, identify the third-party dependency as the cause, and track remediation actions to senior managementCorrect
  3. CIncrease the impact tolerance to 6 hours so the test passes
  4. DExclude the result because the cause was external to the firm

Explanation

A 6-hour recovery exceeds the 4-hour tolerance, so it is a breach that must be reported with root cause and remediation. Changing the tolerance to fit results defeats its purpose, and third-party dependencies remain the firm's responsibility.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Reporting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Reporting questions