Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Rise and Risks of Private Credit

A pension fund holds a direct-lending fund interest that reports quarterly net asset values based on the manager's internal models, while comparable public leveraged loans trade daily and fell sharply last quarter. The fund's reported NAV barely moved. Which risk interpretation is most appropriate for the pension fund's risk manager?

Model-based, infrequent private credit valuations smooth returns and understate true volatility and drawdowns. The risk manager should adjust reported risk upward, for example by unsmoothing returns or using public proxies, because stable NAVs reflect valuation practice rather than lower economic credit risk.

  1. AReported NAV stability shows the underlying loans carry low credit risk
  2. BSmoothed, model-based valuations can understate volatility and drawdowns, so reported risk should be adjusted upwardCorrect
  3. CQuarterly reporting removes valuation risk because lenders hold loans to maturity
  4. DLow NAV volatility proves the loans are less correlated with public credit markets in fundamentals

Explanation

Private credit marks are usually model-based and infrequent, which smooths returns and understates volatility and correlation with public markets. Risk managers should unsmooth or stress the data. Low reported volatility reflects valuation practice, not necessarily lower economic risk.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Rise and Risks of Private Credit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise The Rise and Risks of Private CreditFree diagnostic mock

More The Rise and Risks of Private Credit questions