IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Statistics · Generalised linear models
A Poisson GLM with log link has a coefficient estimate of 0.30 for a vehicle-type indicator with standard error 0.12. Which statement is correct for a Wald test at 5% (critical value 1.96) and the multiplicative effect on the mean?
The Wald statistic is 0.30/0.12 = 2.5, above 1.96, so the effect is significant. Under a log link the mean is multiplied by exp(0.30), approximately 1.35.
- Az = 2.5, significant; the mean is multiplied by about 1.35Correct
- Bz = 2.5, significant; the mean is increased by 0.30
- Cz = 0.4, not significant; the mean is multiplied by 1.35
- Dz = 2.5, significant; the mean is multiplied by 0.74
- z = 0.36, not significant; the mean is multiplied by 1.30
Explanation
z = 0.30/0.12 = 2.5 > 1.96, so significant. With a log link the multiplicative effect is exp(0.30) = 1.35. Option 2 ignores the log link and option 4 uses exp(-0.30).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Generalised linear models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Generalised linear models questions
- A Poisson log-link GLM for claim frequency gives a coefficient of 0.30 for 'urban' relative to the base level 'rural'. Holding other factors…
- In IRLS for a Poisson GLM with log link, the working weight for an observation is W = (d(mu)/d(eta))^2 / Var(Y). What is W for an observatio…
- A claim count N follows a Poisson distribution with mean μ. Written in exponential family form, what are the canonical parameter θ, the func…
- For a Bernoulli response with success probability p, the pmf is written in exponential family form. Which choice gives the canonical paramet…
- Y is distributed as an exponential family member with b(θ) = −ln(−θ) for θ < 0 and φ = 1/ν for a constant ν > 0. Using E(Y) = b'(θ) and Var(…
- Two nested Poisson GLMs for claim counts are fitted to the same data. Model A (5 parameters) has deviance 312.4. Model B (8 parameters) adds…