FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction
A portfolio has a 10% allocation to a hedge fund strategy whose loss in a stress scenario is estimated by two methods. Method A shocks only equities by -25%, holding rates and spreads fixed, giving a portfolio loss of 6.0%. Method B uses a market-driven scenario with the same -25% equity shock but lets rates fall 100 bp and spreads widen 150 bp, giving a loss of 8.5%. The portfolio holds long-duration bonds that gain from falling rates and credit positions that lose from wider spreads. Which conclusion is best supported?
Method A understated the stress loss. Under the same equity shock, the market-driven scenario also moved rates and spreads, and the loss rose from 6.0% to 8.5%. This means spread-widening losses on credit positions outweighed duration gains from falling rates, which the single-factor shock ignored.
- AMethod A is superior because it isolates the equity effect and is therefore more plausible
- BThe extra loss in Method B shows spread widening losses exceed the duration gains from falling rates, so Method A understated the stress lossCorrect
- CMethod B must be wrong because falling rates should reduce losses more than spreads increase them
- DThe two methods differ only because of sampling error in the equity shock
Explanation
Method B adds rate and spread moves to the same equity shock and loss rises from 6.0% to 8.5%, a net 2.5% increase from the additional factors. Hence credit losses outweighed duration gains, and Method A, ignoring co-movement, understated the loss. The equity shock is identical, so sampling error does not explain the difference.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions
- A risk team builds a stress scenario by observing how a broad set of market variables have co-moved historically and then shocking a small n…
- Using a conditional expected shock approach, a risk manager stresses factor X by 3 standard deviations. Factor Y has correlation 0.5 with X.…
- After running a market-driven scenario, a risk manager finds that most of the portfolio loss comes from a single position with a concentrate…
- A risk team constructs a stress scenario by shocking the equity index by -3 standard deviations and then, to measure plausibility, computes …
- An equity index has monthly volatility of 5%. A credit spread factor has monthly volatility of 20 bps and correlation of -0.60 with the equi…
- A practitioner notes that historical correlations between a stress driver and other risk factors are much higher during crisis periods than …