Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities

A portfolio manager at a fund firm learns, through a friend at a listed company, that a takeover bid will be announced next week. He buys shares in the target for the fund and for his own account. Which compliance risk is most directly realized?

Insider trading, a form of market abuse, is realized. The manager traded on material non-public information about a pending takeover, obtained from a company contact. Churning involves excessive trading for commissions, and liquidity or capital reporting issues are not implicated by these facts.

  1. AInsider trading, a form of market abuseCorrect
  2. BChurning of client accounts
  3. CBreach of fund liquidity limits
  4. DLate regulatory capital reporting

Explanation

Trading on material non-public information about a takeover is insider trading. Churning means excessive trading to generate commissions, which is not the motive here. Liquidity limits and capital reporting are unrelated to the facts.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities questions