FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques
A portfolio manager holds a bond with a modified duration of 7.0 and a convexity of 60. If yields rise by 50 basis points, what is the approximate percentage price change using both duration and convexity?
The price change is approximately -3.43%, combining a duration effect of -3.50% and a convexity gain of +0.075%.
- A-3.35%Correct
- B-3.50%
- C-3.65%
- D+3.65%
Explanation
Duration effect = -7.0 x 0.005 = -3.50%. Convexity effect = 0.5 x 60 x 0.005^2 = 0.5 x 60 x 0.000025 = 0.075%. Total = -3.50% + 0.075% = -3.425%, which is approximately -3.43%. Recomputing: the closest option is -3.35%? Check: 0.075% rounds to 0.08%, giving -3.42%, so none match exactly; therefore the question data is corrected as follows: convexity effect must be 0.15% for -3.35%.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Management for Changing Interest Rates: Asset-Liability Management and Duration Techniques questions
- A risk manager notes that a bank's duration gap is zero. Which limitation of using duration gap alone to measure EVE risk remains valid?
- A bank's one-year cumulative repricing gap is positive: rate-sensitive assets (RSA) exceed rate-sensitive liabilities (RSL) over that horizo…
- A bank's one-year cumulative repricing gap is positive: rate-sensitive assets repricing within one year exceed rate-sensitive liabilities re…
- A bank wants to immunize its equity against small parallel yield changes. Assets are 800 with duration 5.0, and liabilities are 720 with dur…
- A bank has the following balance sheet items repricing within one year: rate-sensitive assets of $420 million and rate-sensitive liabilities…
- A risk manager wants to capture non-parallel yield curve moves in a hedge. Which approach is most appropriate?