Skip to content

ACCA Applied Skills · Financial Management · Financial and other objectives in not-for-profit organisations

A public sector school received $900,000 funding. It spent $850,000 on inputs, when a comparable school bought the same inputs for $800,000. Its 500 pupils achieved an average exam pass rate of 70%, against a target of 80%. Which statement is correct?

The school was neither economical nor effective. It paid $850,000 for inputs that cost a comparable school $800,000, so it lacked economy. Its 70% pass rate fell short of the 80% target, so it also lacked effectiveness.

  1. AThe school was economical and effective but not efficient
  2. BThe school was neither economical nor effective, based on the data givenCorrect
  3. CThe school was economical but not effective
  4. DThe school was effective but not economical

Explanation

Inputs cost $850,000 against $800,000 for the same inputs elsewhere, so the school was not economical. The pass rate of 70% is below the 80% target, so it was not effective. The option claiming economy ignores the higher input cost, and the option claiming effectiveness ignores the missed target.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Financial and other objectives in not-for-profit organisations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Financial and other objectives in not-for-profit organisations questions