CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws
A recognised stock exchange refused to list the securities of Sagar Infra Ltd and furnished its reasons on 10 June. Under section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, by when should the company appeal to SAT against the refusal, ignoring the extension for omission cases?
The company must appeal within fifteen days from the date on which the stock exchange furnishes reasons for refusing to list. The period for listing refusals under section 22A is shorter than the forty-five days applicable to other appeals, and it does not run from the application date.
- AWithin 15 days from 10 June, the date reasons were furnishedCorrect
- BWithin 45 days from 10 June
- CWithin 15 days from the date of the application for listing
- DWithin 30 days from the date SEBI is informed of the refusal
Explanation
Section 22A(1)(a) gives the company fifteen days from the date on which reasons for refusal are furnished to it. The 45 day period applies to appeals under section 23L, not to a listing refusal under section 22A, so that option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws questions
- Ritu Capital is advised on appeal routes after a SAT decision under the SEBI Act. Which statement correctly identifies the forum for appeal …
- Vardhan Securities Ltd faces proceedings related to the holding and transfer of securities under the Depositories Act, 1996. It contends tha…
- Pranav Depository Participants Pvt Ltd is aggrieved by a SAT order passed under the Depositories Act, 1996. It receives communication of the…
- During an appeal by Deshmukh Investments against an adjudicating officer's order under the SCRA, 1956, SAT wishes to have a witness examined…
- A depository's draft bye-laws, adopted without SEBI's approval, are challenged. Later SEBI, finding a bye-law inadequate, orders the deposit…
- Ketan Rao is being prosecuted before a Special Court established under the SEBI Act, 1992 for a securities offence. His counsel argues that …