CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Debt Recovery and Securitization
A Recovery Officer attaches and sells a property of Verma Traders to recover a bank's certificate debt. Verma Traders, from whom Rs 6,00,000 is due as determined by the Tribunal, appeals under section 30 against the Recovery Officer's order. Which statement is correct regarding the deposit?
The appeal will not be entertained unless Rs 3,00,000 is deposited with the Tribunal. Section 30A requires fifty per cent of the debt due, as determined by the Tribunal, to be deposited for appeals against Recovery Officer orders under section 30.
- ANo deposit is needed because the appeal is against a Recovery Officer, not the Tribunal
- BThe appeal will not be entertained by the Tribunal unless Rs 3,00,000 is deposited with itCorrect
- CThe appeal will not be entertained unless Rs 4,50,000 is deposited with the Appellate Tribunal
- DA deposit of Rs 1,50,000 suffices, being 25 per cent
Explanation
Section 30A applies to appeals against Recovery Officer orders under section 30. The Tribunal cannot entertain the appeal unless fifty per cent of the debt due, as determined by the Tribunal, is deposited with the Tribunal. 50% of Rs 6,00,000 is Rs 3,00,000. The deposit goes to the Tribunal, not the Appellate Tribunal, and section 30A contains no 25 per cent reduction proviso.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Debt Recovery and Securitization shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Debt Recovery and Securitization questions
- Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd, Surat, owes Bank of Baroda a debt that the Debts Recovery Tribunal determined at Rs 4 crore under section 19. Sunr…
- During hearing of a section 17 application by Narmada Exports, the DRT wants to examine a bank officer on oath, call for loan documents, and…
- Under the Act's definition of 'security interest', which of the following is expressly included in addition to a mortgage, charge, hypotheca…
- Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd (Surat) defaulted on a secured loan. On 3 March, Western Bank took possession of the mortgaged factory under the SA…
- Canara Fin, a financial institution, sold to Vega ARC (a registered reconstruction company) a non-performing loan to Dev Plastics. The loan …
- Lotus Steels Ltd appeals to the Tribunal against a Recovery Officer's order under section 30. It argues that, as with appeals under section …