CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Accounts and Records
A registered person fails to account for certain goods as required by section 35(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. What may the proper officer do?
The proper officer may determine the tax payable on the unaccounted goods or services as if the person had supplied them. Section 35(6) applies the demand provisions of sections 73, 74 or 74A mutatis mutandis, subject to section 17(5)(h).
- ADetermine the tax on the unaccounted goods as if they had been supplied by that person, applying the demand provisions mutatis mutandisCorrect
- BCancel the registration automatically without any proceedings
- COnly impose a late fee under the annual return provisions
- DTreat the goods as exempt supplies
Explanation
Section 35(6), subject to section 17(5)(h), lets the proper officer determine the tax payable on goods or services not accounted for as if supplied by that person, with sections 73, 74 or 74A applying mutatis mutandis. The other options have no basis in that sub-section.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Accounts and Records shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Accounts and Records questions
- Meera Textiles failed to account for certain goods as required by section 35(1). Subject to section 17(5)(h), what does section 35(6) empowe…
- Meena Components' annual return for FY 2022-23 was due on 31 December 2023. In an appeal about that year, the Appellate Authority finally di…
- Kaveri Traders has its principal place of business in Pune and an additional place of business in Nashik, both shown in its certificate of r…
- Ravi Logistics, an unregistered goods transporter, wishes to comply with the CGST Rules regarding records under section 35(2). Which stateme…
- Spice Route Traders Ltd files its annual return for FY 2024-25 on its due date. Under Section 36 of the CGST Act, 2017, for how long must it…
- Under the CGST Rules, a registered person keeps accounts electronically. On demand by the proper officer, which obligation applies?