FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Solvency, Liquidity and Other Regulation After the Global Financial Crisis
A regulator publishes an annual list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and places each in a bucket. What is the primary consequence of a bank being placed in a higher bucket under the Basel framework?
A higher G-SIB bucket results in a higher CET1 capital surcharge. Buckets reflect the bank's systemic importance score, and more systemically important banks must hold more loss-absorbing common equity. The framework adds requirements rather than relaxing leverage, TLAC or liquidity rules.
- AA higher common equity Tier 1 capital surchargeCorrect
- BA lower minimum leverage ratio requirement
- CExemption from total loss-absorbing capacity requirements
- DA reduced liquidity coverage ratio requirement
Explanation
The G-SIB framework assigns banks to buckets based on indicator scores, and each bucket carries an additional CET1 surcharge that rises with systemic importance. The surcharge adds to capital requirements; it does not reduce leverage, TLAC or liquidity requirements, so the other options are wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Solvency, Liquidity and Other Regulation After the Global Financial Crisis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Solvency, Liquidity and Other Regulation After the Global Financial Crisis questions
- A bank has risk-weighted assets of USD 500 billion. It must meet a 4.5% minimum CET1 requirement, a 2.5% capital conservation buffer and a 1…
- A US bank holding company is reviewing its trading activities under the Volcker Rule, which was introduced by the Dodd-Frank Act. Which acti…
- A risk manager at a large dealer bank explains why Dodd-Frank and related rules impose margin requirements on non-centrally-cleared derivati…
- Following the post-crisis derivatives reforms agreed by the G20 and implemented through Dodd-Frank, which requirement applies to standardize…
- A bank's stress test shows its CET1 ratio falling from 11.0% to 6.2% in the severely adverse scenario, against a 4.5% minimum plus a 2.5% ca…
- A global systemically important bank (G-SIB) in a bucket with a 1.5% higher loss absorbency surcharge has RWA of USD 800 billion and total l…